SIRAJUDDIN S/O RATTI MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7545/2026 · 2026-05-22
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7807 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7807 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21883] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7545/2026 Sirajuddin S/o Ratti Mohammad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chidwa, Police Station Nouganva, District Alwar Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 22/05/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 207/2025 registered with the Police Station, Nouganwa, District Alwar for offence under Sections 316(2) & 318(4) of B.N.S., 2023. the accused-petitioner has preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in no manner connected with the alleged sale of land, which is said to be Mandir Mafi land. Learned counsel for the applicant further argues that the petitioner is not a beneficiary in this case. The primary beneficiary is his father, Rati Mohammed, who is alleged to have executed the sale of the property and the petitioner merely signed as a witness. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation and because of any act of the father of the petitioner, which could be a criminal act, the petitioner cannot be penalized. Therefore, the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail. [2026:RJ-JP:21883] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7545/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and because of any act of the father of the petitioner, which could be a criminal act, the petitioner cannot be penalized. therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner namely- Sirajuddin S/o Ratti Mohammad, in connection with FIR No.207/2025 registered with the Police Station, Nouganwa, District Alwar he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv) that the petitioner shall submit his present address to the concerned investigating officer. In case of any change in the present address then also he will intimate the same to the concerned Investigating Officer.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu/144