HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14905 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for respondent-BSA as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners, who are 54 in number, have approached this Court with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the communication dated 18.11.2025 issued by the Finance Controller, Board of Basic Education, U.P. Prayagraj (Annexure no. 6 to the writ petition), the order dated 21.11.2025 issued by the Director of Education (Basic), U.P. Lucknow (Annexure no.7 to the writ petition). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to re-fix the salary of the petitioners by according 1 ^ (st) increment as on 01.01.2017 and to re-fix the salary thereafter within the period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. (iii) Issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to disburse the petitioners their regular monthly salary every month as re-fixed in accordance with the preceding paragraph; (iv) Issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature commanding the respondents to compute entire arrears of salary arising in favour of the petitioners on account of such re-fixation and to disburse the same within a period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court along with interest so specified by this Hon'ble Court. (v) Issue any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (vi) Award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioners." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh, Shivendra Kumar Singh Rohit Kumar And 53 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. The issue in question has already been decided by this Court in Writ A No.481 of 2026, (Seema Ray and 3 Others vs. State of UP and 5 Others), decided on 24.08.2026. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the individual representations, if any, submitted by the petitioners, specifically indicating their respective dates of appointment, dates of joining, and the circumstances in which they could not join on the first day of the relevant month. Upon receipt of such representations, the competent authority shall examine the claim of each petitioner in the light of the statutory provisions, the applicable Government Orders and the observations made by this Court in Seema Ray (supra), and shall pass a reasoned and speaking order, dealing with the individual claim of each petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. September 17, 2026 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 14905 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad