DIPON NARZARY AND 8 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSSAM AND 4 ORS.
WP(C)/3113/2021 · 2026-06-09
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7803 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7803 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010088812021
2026:GAU-AS:8140
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3113/2021 DIPON NARZARY AND 8 ORS.
S/O. LT. MANGAL SING NARZARY, R/O. BIHOGI NAGAR, P.O. NOONMATI, P.S. NARENGI, DIST. KAMRUP(M).
2: RAKESH KALITA S/O. SRI RAJEN CHANDRA KALITA VILL. PARILY NATUN BASTI P.O. AND P.S. PALASHBARI DIST. KAMRUP.
3: ARBIL HOJAI S/O. SRI BIHAR HOJAI R/O. MOSAKA KHERONI DIST. KAMRUP (M).
4: NIPUL AHMED S/O. SRI NAZIR ALI R/O. SONAPUR PIN-784150 DIST. KAMRUP (M).
5: DABAJIT BORDOLOI S/O. SRI MATIRAM BORDOLOI VILL. JAMADARI P.O. GERUA DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM.
6: HITESH HALOI S/O. SRI KAMESWAR HALOI VILL. HARIBHANGA P.S. TIHU PIN-781378 DIST. NALBARI
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM.
7: KRISHNA KANTA LASKAR S/O. SRI HARI KANTA LASKAR R.O. NIJNAHARKALI PIN-781378 DIST. NAGAON ASSAM.
8: SANKAR JOYTI NATH S/O. LT. DHARMESWAR NATH R/O. PUKHURI BEZZERIA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM.
9: SRI JOGESH DEKA S/O. SRI KAMAL DEKA R/O. LAKHIPUR M.G PATH P.S. DISPUR DIST. KAMRUP VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM (DEPTT. OF HOME), DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM.
2:ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 ASSAM.
3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM.
4:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLCE (ADMIN.) POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM.
Page No.# 3/3 5:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (ADMIN) ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F Z MAZUMDER, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 10.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioners on call. Heard Mr. D Borah, learned counsel for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion also, i.e., 05.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on call, despite the matter being called twice on that day. Accordingly, the matter was listed today under the ‘Orders’ column with the remark ‘for dismissal’. Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the petitioners, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant