[2026:RJ-JP:20611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8698/2026 Ramsahay Kushwah S/o Lutteram Kushwah, Age 35 Years, R/o Village Mengari, PO: Fatehpur, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principle Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/05/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents may be directed to expeditiously decide the representation dated 02.04.2025 filed by the petitioner against his suspension order dated 13.03.2024. Counsel places reliance upon the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary versus Union of India & Anr. reported in AIR 2015 SC 2389 and submits that petitioner is entitled to reinstatement pending inquiry. 2. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of [2026:RJ-JP:20611] (2 of 2) [CW-8698/2026] this order. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in the light of ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar (supra), but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondent No.2 is under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed-post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail address in his representation. 3. In the event, the petitioner is not satisfied with the decision of the respondent No.2 on his representation, he would be at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the petitioner’s representation independently and strictly in accordance with law. 6. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /31