FAYAZ AHMAD RENZOO AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (POLLUTION) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/823/2026 · 2026-04-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 780 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 780 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 823/2026 CM(2122/2026).
FAYAZ AHMAD RENZOO AND ANOTHER.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M. M. Shah, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (POLLUTION) AND OTHERS.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 21.04.2026
01. After arguing for a while, when learned counsel for the petitioners was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition on the ground that no cause of action has presently accrued to the petitioners for filing the same, he seeks withdrawal of the instant petition.
02. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one as and when cause of action accrues.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 21.04.2026 Bisma Jan.
211 Suppl-I