M/S.THE RMC TRADERS v. THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION
WP/42664/2025 · 2026-02-13
V Lakshminarayanan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 77986 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 77986 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 42664 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 42664 of 2025 M/s.The RMC Traders, Rep. by its Partner, M.Sivaganesan, No.1, Amir Mahal Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Information Commission Block No.19, Government Farm Village, Panepet, Nandanam,Chennai 600 035. 2.The Appellate Authority/ Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600119. 3.The Public Information Officer The Tahsildar, Shollinganallur Taluk, Chennai 600 097. ..Respondent(s) This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass an order direction the 3rd respondent to furnish the information as requested in the application of the petitioner dated 12.04.2025 submitted with 3rd respondent. __________ Page1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Krish Santheep For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Vigneshwaran, For R1 Ms.C.Meera Arumugham, AGP for Mr.M.Shajahan Spl.G.P., For RR2 and 3. ORDER Heard Mr.D.Krish Santheep, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.C.Vigneshwaran, learned counsel for the first respondent, Ms.C.Meera Arumugham, learned Additional Government Pleader representing Mr.M.Shajahan, learned Special Government Pleader, for the respondents 2 and 3. 2. The petitioner came forward with this Writ Petition on account of failure of the respondents 2 and 3 to furnish the information with respect to the Revenue Records maintained by them. He sought mandamus to that effect. Taking into consideration the records he sought are all revenue records, I called upon Mr.M.Shajahan, learned Special Government Pleader, to furnish the same. 3. Pending Writ Petition, the Deputy Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, Chennai 97, has furnished the information to the petitioner. The same is scanned and extracted hereunder: __________ Page2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025 __________ Page5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025
4. In addition, Mr.M.Shajahan, has given duly certified copies of the original “A Register” to Mr.D.Krish Santheep yesterday and he had also acknowledged the due receipt of the same. As the relief the petitioner sought for has been granted, no further orders are necessary apart from recording the fact that the respondents 2 and 3 have furnished the information. Since the information has been furnished, the first respondent shall close the second appeal in SA.No.10946 of 2025 as infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
13-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PVS To
1. The State Information Commission Block No.19,Government Farm Village, Panepet, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035
2. The Appelalte Authority/ Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Sholinganallur, Chennai 600119
3. The Public Information Officer The Tahsildar, Shollinganallur Taluk, Chennai 600 097 __________ Page6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 42664 of 2025 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. PVS WP No. 42664 of 2025 13-02-2026 __________ Page7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis