Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7797 (PNJ)

GOVIND SINGH RATHEE v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/39956/2023 · 2026-03-20

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[247] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-39956-2026 Date of Decision :20.03.2026 Govind Singh Rathee ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and another ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Ms. Chandanpreet Kaur Ahluwalia, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) along with the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.2. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) 1. It is submitted by the learned State counsel that the case is fixed for prosecution witnesses and out of 07 witnesses, 04 have already been examined and the next date in the matter is fixed for 26.05.2026. 2. Since the alleged FIR pertaining to the year 2020, the prosecution is directed to produce all the witnesses before the trial Court on the next date fixed i.e. 26.05.2026 and the trial Court shall make every endeavour to record the statements of all the witnesses and conclude prosecution evidence on the next date. 3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 4. Permitted to do so. 5. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. 20.03.2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) Anjal JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.03.23 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document