Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77964 (MAD)

R.SHANMUGASUNDARAM v. P.S.Rajasekaran (Deceased) 1.R.Mallika and 8 others

A/6093/2025 · 2026-01-05

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 6093 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 6093 of 2025 in C.S.No.125 of 1996 1. R.Shanmugasundaram S/O.LAte P.S.RAJASEKARAN, NO.1/233, PONNIAMMAN KOIL STREET, MADIPAKKAM, CHENNAI-600 091. Applicant(s) Vs 1. P.S.Rajasekaran (Deceased) 1.R.Mallika and 8 others W/o.Late P.S.Rajasekaran, No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091. 2.R.Kumaraguru S/o.Late P.s.Rajasekaran, No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091 Saraswathi (Deceased) 3.P.S.Sendilvel Murugan S/o.Late Sivam, No.24/1 Veda Vinayagar Street, Avadi, Chennai 600 054. 4.Sundari Sampath No.1/233, Ponniamman Koil Street, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 6093 of 2025 5.T.Logesh (Minor) S/o.Late P.S.Thiyagarajan, Represented by his Mother and Natural Guardian T.Girija NO.292, Thiruvalluvar Street Ramakrishna Alawar Thirunagar, Chennai 600 087. 6.V.Natarajan No.18, Adipureeswarar Koil Street, Pallikaranai, Chennai 601 302. 7.Sundari S W/o.Late P.S.Sivaramakrishnan, No.20, Haji Shaik Hussain Street, 1st Lane, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014. 8.S.Rajalakshmi D/o.Late P.S.Sivaramakrishnan 9.S.Ganesh S/o.Late P.S.Sivaramakrishnan Respondent(s) PRAYER: Application is filed to allow this application to transpose the 4th Plaintiff into defendant in the above suit in C.S.No.125 of 1996 pending before this Court, rank him as Defendant in the above C.S.No.125 of 1996 on the file of this Honble Court. For Applicant(s): M/S.Titus Knock For Respondent: Mr.P.Nellaiappan for D1 and D2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 6093 of 2025 ORDER This Application is filed to transpose the 4th Plaintiff as one of the defendants in the above suit. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant / fourth plaintiff submitted that it is difficult for the fourth plaintiff to sail along with the other plaintiffs and it would not be appropriate, in the fitness of things, to stand as the plaintiff when there is conflict of interest. 3. As the applicant has stated acceptable reasons to transpose himself as one of the defendants, I feel the application should be allowed. 4. Accordingly, this application is allowed. 05-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 6093 of 2025 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn A No. 6093 of 2025 In CS No.125 of 1996 05-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis