Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7794 (GAU)

NOOR AHMED CHOWDHURY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/856/2022 · 2026-06-09

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010121062021 2026:GAU-AS:8141 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/856/2022 NOOR AHMED CHOWDHURY AND ANR VILL- AMBARI, P.O- MURAJHAR, DIST- HOJAI, ASSAM 2: RANJIT CH. LASKOR S/O- BOLIN CH. LASKAR VILL- NIZ DOBOKA P.O- AND P.S- DOBOKA DIST- HOJAI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT and RURAL DEV. DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY- 6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY- 37. ASSAM 3:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM PANJABARI JURIPAR GHY- 37. 4:HOJAI ZILLA PARISHAD ZILLA PARISHAD REP. BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M SAIKIA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 10.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioners on call. Heard Mr. S Dutta, learned Standing counsel, P&RD for the respondents. It appears that on the last occasion also, i.e., 05.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on call, despite the matter being called twice on that day. Accordingly, the matter was listed today under the ‘Orders’ column with the remark ‘for dismissal’. Today also when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the consecutive non-appearance of the petitioners, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant