Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7793 (KAR)

SRI C V KANTHRAJ v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13721/2026 · 2026-04-28

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 13721 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI C.V. KANTHRAJ S/O VEEREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O CHIKKAKOLALA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINOD GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKMAGALURU TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKMAGALURU TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577101. 4. THE TASILDHAR CHIKMAGALURU TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.R. KHAMROZ KHAN, AGA) Digitally signed by YASHODA K L Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING NO.DCCKM-REV/148/2025-REV-DC-C NO.931394 DATED 07.08.2025, AS PER THE ANNEXURE-G PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND COMP;NO.924811;KANDYAGRAMA;CKMAC/34014/408/2025 DATED 15.12.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AS PER ANNEXURE-H AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned Form 2-E issued by the respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Chikkamagaluru District, exercising his powers under Section 38A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, declaring certain areas as ‘unrecorded - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 habitation’, which also includes the land belonging to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are several judgments of this Court including a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.101121/2022 and connected matters, which were disposed of on 23.01.2024, followed by orders passed in W.P.No.9321/2024 dated 22.01.2025 and W.P.No.103974/2022 dated 28.02.2025, where this Court has clearly held that the Court has come across several matters where notifications under Section 38A of the Act, 1961, have been issued by Deputy Commissioners without issuing any public notice and/or even verifying the revenue records. The Deputy Commissioners were advised that in future they shall firstly look into the revenue records, obtain the details as regards the lands which are proposed to be notified under Section 38A of the Act, before issuing any notification. It was directed that if entries are found in the revenue records showing an individual as the khathedar, then notices will have to be - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 issued to such persons who are the recorded kathedars. It was directed that if no entries are found, then the Deputy Commissioner will have to record such a statement that no entries are found in the revenue records, so that in the event of any challenge being raised, the Deputy Commissioner can fall back on the said information. 5. This Court has also considered the powers of the Deputy Commissioner as contained in Section 38A (1) of the Act,1961. The provision reads as follows; “(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, where in any village, agricultural labourer is ordinarily residing on dwelling house on a land not belonging to him in an unrecorded habitations like Lambani Tanda, Gollarahatti, Vaddarahatti, Kurubarhatti, Nayakarahatti, Majare Grama, Haadi, Doddi, Palya, Camp, Colony or any other such unrecorded habitations falling within the jursidiction of that village, on the date of commencement of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 2016, which is notified as such by the Deputy Commissioner, specifying the survey numbers and boundaries in the pre scribed manner, such dwelling house or houses along with the site thereof and land immediately appurtenant thereto and necessary for its enjoyment shall, on the date of such notification by the Deputy - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 Commissioner, vest absolutely in the State Government, free from all encumbrances and the agricultural labourer shall be entitled to be registered as owner thereof.” 6. It is therefore clear that if the revenue records disclose the fact that the lands are standing in the name of a private individual, then it will not permit the Deputy Commissioner to record the same as ‘unrecorded habitations’. In that view of the matter, it is clear that in all cases where the revenue records would reveal or disclose the name of a private individual as the khathedar, then it would divest the Deputy Commissioner from power to proceed as ‘unrecorded habitation’. From a perusal of the RTC at Annexures-B, it is evident that the name of the petitioner was entered in the said document as khathedar of the said land. 7. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned Form 2-E at Annexure-G dated 07.08.2025 bearing No.DCCKM-REV/148/2025-REV-DC-C No.931394 and the order bearing No.Comp.No.924811 : - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23818 WP No. 13721 of 2026 kandyagrama : CKMAC/34014/ 408/2025 dated 15.12.2025 at Annexure ‘H’ passed by respondent No.2- Deputy Commissioner, Chikkamagaluru District, are hereby quashed and set aside. Consequently, it is hereby directed that respondents-Tahsildar, Chikkamagaluru Taluk and the Deputy Commissioner, Chikkamagaluru District, shall immediately restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records. 8. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/-