MAHENDRA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/28710/2026 · 2026-09-17
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7792 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28710 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
2. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus to direct the respondent no.2/ Sub-Divisional Officer, Jakhaniya, District- Ghazipur to decide the Case No.6998 of 2025, Computerized Case No.T2025142906998 (Mahendra and others vs. Kalp Nath and others), under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the proceeding under Section 134 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.2 since 2024. He further submitted that the copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
4. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the aforementioned case after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra Kushwaha, Vibhuti Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Mahendra And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s)
the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. September 18, 2026 Rameez WRIC No. 28710 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad