Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77915 (MAD)

Mr. K.Raju v. Mrs. K.Pushpa and another

CONT P/3763/2025 · 2026-01-02

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 ------------------------------ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.01.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 K.Raju ...Petitioner Vs. 1.K.Pushpa, The Special District Revenue Officer (LA), National Highways No.7, 46, 47 & 66, Krishnagiri. 2.K.Srinivasalu, The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, PIU, Salem, Door No.212-3/D3-1, Sri Nagar Colony, Narasothipatti, Salem – 636 004. ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for their willful and wanton disobedience of the order dated 05.06.2024 passed by this Court in W.A.No.2495 of 2021. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 ------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkat Raman For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl. GP for R1 Mr.Su.Srinivasan, Standing Counsel Standing Counsel for R2 ****** O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that final award proceedings was concluded and award was passed on 15.09.2025. However, the claim in entirety as such sought for is yet to be settled. 2. It is for the petitioner to approach the competent Authority if he is not satisfied with the award already passed in compliance with the orders of this Court. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is aged about 86 years. Taking into consideration the age factor of the petitioner, in the event of preferring any appeal, the competent Authority shall dispose of by giving priority, by considering the age of the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 ------------------------------ 4. In respect of present Contempt Petition, since the order is already complied with, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken. Accordingly, this Contempt Petitions stands closed. (S.M.S., J.) (C.K ., J.) 02.01.2026 dsa Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 ------------------------------ S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J. dsa Cont.P.No.3763 of 2025 02.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis