Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7791 (AP)

Velagala Durga Prasada Reddy v. Sunkara Bheemarjuna Rao

AS/40/2014 · 2026-08-12

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010132212014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 40 OF 2014 Between: 1. Velagala Durga Prasada Reddy, S/o. Dharma Reddy R/o. Door No.21-7-17 Ramaraju Street Mutyalampadu Vijayawada Krishna District ...Petitioner AND 1. Sunkara Bheemarjuna Rao, S/o. Radha Krishna R/o. D.No. 23- 15-92 Bhanu Nagar Machavaram Vijayawada Krishna District 2. Sunkara Ammaji, W/o. Bheemarjuna Rao R/o. D.No. 23-15- 92/1 Bhanu NAgar Machavaram Vijayawada Krishna District ...Respondents filed under Section 96 of CPC, aggrieved by the Decree and Judgment dated 01.04.2013 in O.S.No. 577 of 2007 on the file of the court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Vijayawada. Counsel for the Petitioner: UMA DEVI MAGANTI 2 Counsel for the Respondents: . Counsel for the Respondents:SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.40 of 2014 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for both sides is present. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mrs. Umadevi Maganti, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties outside the Court, the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same is endorsed on the bundle. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO 13.08.2026 LSP