IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11856 of 2026 Kumar Sugyan …. Petitioner Mr. B. Satapathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC Ms. K.T. Mudali, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Sr. Advocate for OPSC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 02.05.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Even though a prayer has been made to direct the Opp. Party No.1 to provide appointment order in favour of the petitioner but in course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly contended that petitioner in the meantime has already got the benefit of appointment. But in the said order of appointment, it has been indicated that appointment will be subject to final outcome of the connected W.P.(C) No.6881 of 2026. p. 2 p. 2 4. Taking into account the nature of interim order passed in the connected W.P.(C) No.6881 of 2026 and the fact that petitioner has already got the benefit of appointment, it is the view of this Court that the prayer as made in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev