Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7787 (RAJ)

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. M/S BRAHAM PRAKASH MODI

CMA/338/2026 · 2026-05-25

Baljinder Singh Sandhu, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 338/2026 The State Of Rajasthan, Through Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, District Division - North (Presently District Division-Ii), Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus M/s Braham Prakash Modi, Registered Partnership Firm, Situated At Neem Ka Thana, Sikar District, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG with Mr. Priyam Agarwal Ms. Tanisha Pant Ms. Monisha Agarwal Mr. Kshitij Jain with OIC Chief Engineer Mr. Satyendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjog Kamal Sharma HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU (through V.C.) Order 25/05/2026 The sole arbitrator has passed an award on 17.12.2006. The objections against the same were raised by the State on 19.08.2021. The application under Section 34 was rejected by the Commercial Court No.3, Jaipur Metro IInd, Jaipur. The present Misc. Appeal has been filed after a huge delay of 1538 days. Although, we had called the Chief Engineer to explain the delay, no satisfactory explanation has come forward. He clearly states that action is going to be taken against the concerned officials. Once an award is being passed and objections (2 of 2) [CMA-338/2026] have been rejected, on very limited aspect, we may entertain an appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act that too within limitation. However, the award which was passed in the year 2006 would not be disturbed by us after a period of 20 years. The huge delay is sufficient to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ 50/mayank/415