IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRR-970-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.04.2026 PARDEEP VOHRA ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the peoner. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present peon has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 16.03.2026 passed by the learned JMIC, Karnal, whereby charges under Secons 419, 420, 506 and 120-B IPC (corresponding to Secons 319, 318, 351 and 61 of the BNS) have been framed against the peoner, allegedly contrary to the facts and evidence on record as well as the se6led posion of law on the issue. 2. Although this Court has concurrent jurisdicon to entertain the present peon, but it would be appropriate if the peoner first exhausts the remedy available before the learned Sessions Court and it would also be beneficial for him for giving another right to challenge the judgment, in case, the decision of the Sessions Court is not favourable to him. 3. Counsel for the peoner submits that he wants to withdraw the present peon with liberty to file the fresh peon before the learned Sessions Court. 4. Given above, the present peon stands disposed of having been withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is clarified that the me for which the present peon is pending before this Court shall not be counted for the purpose of limitaon and the limitaon for filing the fresh peon before the learned Sessions Court shall start from today. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 16.04.2026 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.04.17 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.