Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7785 (PAT)

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./9938/2026 · 2026-02-23

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9938 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- CHERIYA BARIYARPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dharmendra Kumar Son of Harilal Mahto Resident of Village- Ekdara Ward No. 03, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(1) And 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 66 litres of liquor from a truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9938 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated and at the same time shall bring disrepute to his business. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his driver and cleaner (khalasi) would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who also fled from the spot. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Cheriya Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS. 7. 7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, it Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9938 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T