Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7782 (ALL)

PAPPU v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/9683/2026 · 2026-09-16

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9683 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Shri Bharat Singh, Learned counsel for the informant has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of one case being Case Crime No.141/2026 in which the wife of the applicant had applied for anticipatory bail before this Court. The applicant has not disclosed this fact in affidavit filed before this Court and a declaration has been made that the applicant has no other criminal history. 2. On being confronted with this fact, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with the liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after disclosing the complete criminal antecedents of the applicant, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the above mentioned liberty. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copy, if any, filed along with the bail application to the counsel for the applicant. September 17, 2026 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarve Nazir, Zafar Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Pappu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad