Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7781 (AP)

Sri. Kuppili Eswara Varaprasada Rao v. CANARA BANK

WP/16098/2025 · 2026-08-12

Battu Devanand, Sunitha Gandham

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010322342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16098 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sri. Kuppili Eswara Varaprasada Rao, S/o Sita Ramaiah, R/at D.no. 18-8/1, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam, A.P.-530027. ...Petitioner AND 1. CANARA BANK, Madhurawada Branch, Rep by its Authorised Officer and Chief Manager, Visakhapatnam, A.P.-530041. 2. The Advocate Commissioner, appointed in CrI.M.P.No.101/2025 Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam, A.P.-530002. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing warrant for possession in CrI.M.P. No. 101 of 2025 and initiating coercive steps without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary, and as well direct the 1st Respondent to grant a 2 reasonable period to the Petitioner to clear the remaining loan amount, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the order in CrI M.P. No. 101 of 2025 of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam including the warrant dated 01-07-2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to treat the additional affidavit as part and parcel of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M.M.M. KRISHNA SANAPALA Counsel for the Respondents: SREEDHAR VALIVETI The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO. 16098 OF 2025 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) Smt Samantha Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri M.M.M. Krishna Sanapala, learned counsel for the petitioner on record sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ____________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM Dated: 13.08.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO. 16098 OF 2025 Dated: 13.08.2026 TM