Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 778 (RAJ)

CHANDRASHAKAR S/O SHRI CHINGARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1398/2026 · 2026-03-09

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10120] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1398/2026 Chandrashakar S/o Shri Chingaram, Resident Of Bada Gaon Thana Nadoti District Karauli At Present Residing At House No. 7 Ma/102, Indra Gandhi Nagar Thana Khonagoriyan Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Mahavir Sansi S/o Shri Feariya Sansi, Resident Of Aacharya Ki Dhani, Aasiyana Nagar Thana Khonagoriyan, Jaipur. ----Complainant/Respondent 3. Victim, R/o ----Victim/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/03/2026 1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.425/2019 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC along with all consequential proceedings. 2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that marriage has been solemnized between the petitioner and victim, and they are blessed with two children from this wedlock. He further submits [2026:RJ-JP:10120] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1398/2026] that presently, the petitioner and victim are living happily, therefore, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. 4. The complainant and victim, present in person, do not dispute the aforesaid facts as stated by the counsel for the petitioner and thus, submit that they do not want to pursue the impugned FIR as well as consequential proceedings. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that marriage has been solemnized between the petitioner and victim and they have been blessed with two children from their wedlock, and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and FIR No.425/2019 registered at Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) along with all consequential proceedings is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/127