Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 4182 of 2026 Narayana Panda ..... Petitioner Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC Mr. P.K. Tripathy, Advocate (TPNODL) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 22.04.2026 Order No. 05 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Pursuant to order dtd.09.02.2026, learned counsel appearing for the TPNODL produced the instruction so issued by the Executive Engineer, Basta Electrical Division vide letter dtd.11.02.2026 in Court. The same be kept in record. 3. Heard Mr. P.C. Jena, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. S.P. Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opp. Parties and Mr. P.K. Tripathy, learned counsel appearing for the TPSODL. 4. Even though the present writ petition has been filed inter alia apprehending that basing on Annexure-7, power supply will be provided to the PLI point of Opp. Party No. 11, but basing on the instruction Mr. P.K. Tripathy, learned counsel appearing for the TPNODL contended that Opp. Party No. 11 will not be provided with power supply as he is not eligible to get the same for technical reason. Page 2 of 2. 5. Considering the submission made and the instruction so provided, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner does not intend to press the writ petition any further. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha