Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7779 (BOM)

KISANRAO JANARDANRAO GHODESWAR v. SUDHAKAR SHESHRAOJI BHELE

CAS/1240/2026 · 2026-09-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 27. CAS 1240.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.1240 OF 2026, 1239 OF 2026 AND 1241 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.130 OF 2007 Kisanrao J. Ghodeshwar (dead) thru. Lrs’ Nirmala and ors. Vs. Sudhakar S. Bhele Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Ms. Bhavya Dhruv, Advocate h/f. Mr. Harish Dangre, Advocate for applicants/appellants. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATE : 09.09.2026. . The present applications are filed seeking condonation of delay of 476 days in filing application for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondent on record and for setting aside abatement against him. 2. The appellants have stated that the sole respondent died on 12.05.2025 and that they came to know about his death through the learned counsel for the respondent in June, 2026. Thereafter, the appellants have taken steps to set aside the abatement and for bringing the legal representatives of deceased respondent on record. 3. Considering the reasons given in the applications, the applications are allowed. Delay of 476 days caused in filing application for bringing the legal representatives of 2 27. CAS 1240.26.odt deceased respondent on record is condoned. The abatement is set aside and permission is granted to the appellants to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent on record. 4. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks. 5. After amendment being carried out, issue notice to the proposed legal representatives of deceased respondent, returnable after four weeks. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) T αɳɱαყ...