IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1616/2026 Decided on: 21.05.2026 M/s Himalaya Gas Company …Petitioner Versus India Oil Corporation & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: - “(i) That an appropriate writ, order directions may kindly be issued and impugned order Annexure P-9 dated 9.1.2026 as also Annexure P- 10 dated 10.1.2026 may kindly be quashed and set aside with further directions to the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue with the LPG distributorship in the same fashion as it was operating prior to that from the same place by further directing the respondents to enter into an agreement on the basis of approval granted in principle for reconstitution of the petitioner firm in the Interest of law and justice. (ii) That an appropriate writ, order be to or the directions may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed complete reconstitution proposal on the basis of approval granted in principle dated 25.8.2022 (4.7.2024) without insisting for ownership documents of show room and go down and any such condition may very kindly be quashed and set aside and further directions may also kindly be issued to the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 respondents to permit the petitioner to continue with the LPG distributorship from the same place in the interest of law and justice.” 2. Pursuant to the orders passed in this writ petition from time to time, learned counsel for the respondents placed on record instructions dated 23.04.2026 from respondent No.3 conveying the revival of petitioner’s distributorship with immediate effect with further request to the petitioner to commence operations of the distributorship. 3. Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has since commenced distributorship operations and is running the same. Learned Senior Advocate further submitted that there are certain surviving grievances of the petitioner and, therefore, the petitioner be permitted to avail appropriate remedy for the redressal of those issues, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum. Taking note of above submissions, the present petition is disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum for redressal of its surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 21st May, 2026(rohit)