Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7775 (AP)

P KALYAN KUMAR v. POOLA LAKSHMI PRASANNA

CRLRC/677/2024 · 2026-08-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010300132024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 677/2024 Between: 1. P KALYAN KUMAR, S/O. P. BALA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-3-71, KOTTA STREET, BADVEL TOWN SS MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT 2. P. BALA SUBBARAYUDU, S/O. P.CHINNA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-3-71, KOTTA STREET, BADVEL TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT 3. P. KUSUMA KUMARI, W/O. P. BALA SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-3-71, KOTTA STREET, BADVEL TOWN 86 MANDAL, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. POOLA LAKSHMI PRASANNA, W/O. P. KALYAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC TEACHER, MOTHER INDIA SCHOOL, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA R/O. D.NO.41/41, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT AND ALSO AT MOTHER INDIA SCHOOL, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA 2. POOLA DIVYA SRI MINOR, D/O. P. KALYAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, MINOR, REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER/ RESPONDENT NO. 1 3. POOLA SRIVINMAYA, D/O. P. KALYAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, MINOR, REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER/ RESPONDENT NO.L 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 2. A Memo has been filed. It is submitted that mediation was held between the Petitioners and Respondent No.1, which has fructified. Pursuant thereto, a Memorandum of Understanding has been entered into between the parties, wherein it is recorded that the present Criminal Revision Case filed by the Petitioners shall be withdrawn. 3. Recording the Memo and in view of the above settlement, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 11.08.2026 PRA 3 88 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 677/2024 Date: 11.08.2026 PRA