Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7774 (RAJ)

GAURA WIFE OF RAMRAJ GURJAR D/O RAMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/817/2026 · 2026-05-22

Bhuwan Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21877] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 817/2026 1. Gaura Wife Of Ramraj Gurjar D/o Ramprakash, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Saiya Road, Deen Dayal Marg, Khairagarh, District Agra At Present Village Ulawati, District Dholpur. 2. Ramraj Gurjar Son Of Shri Rajendra Gurjar,aged about years R/o Village Ulawati, District Dholpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur. 3. S.h.o., Police Station, Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (Raj.) 4. Ram Prakesh Son Of Ram Khiladi, (Father Of Petitioner No. 1), 5. Ram Gopal Son Of Ram Khiladi, (Uncle Of Petitioner No.1), 6. Suman Devi Wife Of Ram Prakesh, (Mother Of Petitioner No. 1), 4 to 6 R/o Raseelpur, Police Station Kheragarh, District Agra. (U.p.) 7. Sito Wife Of Amer Singh, R/o Parua, Police Station Garhi Bajna, District Bharatpur. (Relative Of Petitioner No. 1) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Kumar Katara & Mr. Kavish Kumar Verma for Mr. Deepesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 22/05/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:21877] (2 of 3) [CRLW-817/2026] 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners solemnized their marriage on 27.04.2026 at Arya Samaj Sansthan 201-202 Second Floor Apex Towar Lal Kothi Tonk Road Jaipur and same has been registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Jaipur. A copy of the petitioners’ marriage registration certificate has been annexed with the petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but private respondents are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they have prayed for protection. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. 6. Both the petitioners are present in person today in the court. Their signature have been obtained on the court’s order sheet and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before the concerned SHO, who in turn, is directed that if such an application is filed before him, he will [2026:RJ-JP:21877] (3 of 3) [CRLW-817/2026] provide adequate protection to the petitioners as per law and ensure that no harm is caused to them. 8. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 9. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect other civil/ criminal proceedings, if any pending in the present matter. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Anu/222