Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7774 (BOM)

SIDDHARTH S/O. YASHWANT BAMBODKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

WP/4139/2026 · 2026-09-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 28wp4139.3879.3845.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4139/2026 Siddharth Yashwant Bambodkar .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. AND WRIT PETITION NO.3879/2026 Bhagwan Pandurang Khobragade and Ors. .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. AND WRIT PETITION NO.3845/2026 Nathu Raghunath Bhurse and anr. .Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Ritesh R. Dawda, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. A. Ashirgade, Addl.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. C.S. Kaptan, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. D. M. Kale, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 10, 2026. Heard. 2. In response to order dated 13.08.2026, where we have directed respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider making budgetary allocation to the Municipal Councils so as to release the payments due and payable to the employees, learned A.G.P. filed reply and along with reply is annexed Government Resolution dated 25.08.2014. He submits that provision has been made in the Government Resolution where the Municipal Council can raise a demand for additional amount in a case where the Municipal Council has recovered at least 90% of the taxes due and payable to Municipal Council. Thus, it is suggested that the provision is already in place and the respective Municipal Councils can raise the demand for additional budgetary allocation depending on the contingency. 3. If such is the case, we expect respondent No.3-Municipal Council and for that purpose all other Municipal Councils to raise the demands so as to release the payments due and payable to its employees. (2) 28wp4139.3879.3845.26 4. So far as the present petitions are concerned, counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance put forth has been redressed. 5. The statement is accepted. 6. The writ petitions are disposed of. 7. Copy of the order shall be circulated to the Chief Officers of all the Municipal Council. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale Signed by: Kahale Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 10/09/2026 18:12:37