Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7773 (CHH)

NEMU PRASAD SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3556/2026 · 2026-04-23

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3556 of 2026 1 - Nemu Prasad Sahu S/o Bhoj Ram Sahu Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Constable No. 1810, Reserve Police Line, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Bhism Narayan Sahu S/o Patiram Sahu Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Constable No. 1463 Reserve Police Line Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Home Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police Chhattisgarh (Dgp) Police Headquarter Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Durg Range, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Senior Superintendent Of Police Durg, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Additional Superintnendent Of Police Rural Durg Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Deputy Superintendent Of Police Headquarters Durg, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Sdop Patan, Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.04.25 10:42:00 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Janu Khare, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 24.04.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “ 10.1 To kindly issue an order to quash or set aside the order of punishment passed against the petitioner. 10.2 To kindly issue a direction to the respondents to allow the petitioners to participate in the subsequent promotion procedure. 10.3 To kindly grant any other relief that the hon’ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the respondent State submits that against the order of punishment petitioners have submitted an appeal vide Annexure P/6 before the respondent no. 3 and from the date of filing of an appeal it appears that it may be pending till date. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that an appeal submitted by petitioners is yet to be decided and respondent authorities have initiated the proceedings for promotion from Head Constable to Assistant Sub Inspector and if, the appeal is not decided petitioners will be deprived of availing the chance of his consideration for promotion on the post of Assistant Sub Inspector. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievances raised and further considering the fact that 3 appeal has been submitted by petitioners before respondent no. 3, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, directing respondent no. 3 to consider and take decision on the appeal submitted by petitioners against the order of punishment to be decided within further period of two months from the date of receipt of the Order. It is ordered accordingly. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza