Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 77719 (MAD)

Mrs.Thankam Perumal(Deceased) Mrs.C.A.Anitha Pauline v. Mr.C.A.Venkatesh @ CA JOHN MOSES

A/6031/2025 · 2026-01-19

R N Manjula

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 6031 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 6031 of 2025 AND CS NO. 574 OF 2017 Thankam Perumal(Deceased) 1.C.A.Anitha Pauline Applicant(s) Vs C.A.Venkatesh @ C.A. John Moses Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. M. Stalin For Respondent: No Appearance ORDER The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the amendment application has been filed consequent upon the death of the 1st plaintiff. The 2nd plaintiff and defendant are the daughter and son of the 1st plaintiff. In view of the death of the 1st plaintiff, there has been a change in the shares between the parties, and accordingly, the amendment is sought. 2. The respondent has filed no counter and has also not made any representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 6031 of 2025 3. Considering the consequential nature of the amendment, the application is allowed. The learned counsel for the plaintiff is directed to carry out the amendment. 4. Post the matter after two weeks. 19-01-2026 AT Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 6031 of 2025 Dr. R.N.MANJULA, J. AT A No. 6031 of 2025 CS NO. 574 OF 2017 19-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis