Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010109042026
2026:UHC:5524 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/1934/2026
Puran Singh Bisht
--Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand & Anr. --Respondents
With WPMS/1936/2026
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Suryakant Maithani, Advocate, i/b Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Deputy AG, for the State.
(2)
Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions is identical, therefore, these are being heard and decided together by this common
judgment. However, for brevity, facts of Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1934 of 2026 alone are being considered and discussed here.
(3)
According to petitioner, he is Tehri Dam affected person, as his agricultural land was acquired for construction of Tehri Dam. In this writ petition, petitioner contends that he has made a representation to the Director, Rehabilitation stating that less than 50 per cent of his holding was acquired for Tehri Dam Project.
(4)
Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if Director, Rehabilitation is asked to take decision in the matter.
(5)
Writ petitioners are, accordingly,
disposed of with a direction to Director, Rehabilitation to examine petitioners’ claim, strictly as per rehabilitation policy, and take decision, as per law, within eight months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
8.7.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d4 62503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA5 8C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.07.08 19:09:20 +05'30'
UKHC010109042026
2026:UHC:5524