Murari Electricals, a Registered Partnership Firm, v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra
WP/26108/2015 · 2026-08-05
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010686292015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26108 OF 2015 Between:
1. Murari Electricals, a Registered Partnership Firm,, having its registered office at Duvvali Village, Lellapalli Post, Thripuranthakam Mandal, Prakasam District, rep. by its Managing Partner Murari Galaiah yadav S/o. Akkulaiah, aged about 41 years, r/o. Duwali village, Lellapalli Post, Thripuranthakam mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra, Pradesh Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Tirupathi.
2. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation Division, Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Markapur, Prakasam District.
3. The Assistant Engineer Technical Southern Power, Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Markapur, Prakasam District.
4. Mr N Venkata Reddy S/o and age not Known, to the petitioner, Class III Contractor, r/o. Mallapalem village, Pullalacheruvu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 & 3 herein in awarding the contract for the maintenance of sub station at Lellapalli in pursuance to the T.N.No. DEE/O/Markapur/AE-Tech/F.DOC/D.No. 2135/2015, dated 10.07.2015 in favour of the 4th respondent herein who is a Class III Contractor and registered with the 2nd respondnet about 3 months back the price quoted is same in total negation to the terms and conditions of the contract under clause No.52 of the Tender specifications as being iillegal, arbitrary and is in violation of the statutory conditions, and pass such other
order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 33902 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondentsrs 2 & 3 herein not to finalise the Tende in pursuance to the Revised Tender Notice in T.N.No. DEE/0/Markapur/AE-Tech/F.DOC/D.No. 2135/2015, dated 10.07.2015 with respect to Lellapalli Sub station, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 146027 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:JAGARLAMUDIKOTESWARIDEVI(SC FORAPSPDCL) The Court made the following order:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26108 OF 2015
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous.
3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.08.2026 BSP/TPS
4
12 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26108 OF 2015
06.08.2026 BSP/TPS