- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16181 WP No. 9004 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 9004 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: M/S ADARSH CONSTRUCTIONS PARTNERSHIP FIRM, NO 101, MANJUNATHA COMPLEX, 22ND MAIN ROAD, BSK 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-70, REP BY ITS PARTNER S.E. MANJUNATH …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR G.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY (GBA)/ BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP)/ N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002, REP. BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING (CENTRAL ZONE, BENGALURU) 9TH MAIN RD, 2ND BLOCK, JAYA NAGAR EAST, JAYANAGAR - BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER,BBMP BENGALURU CENTRAL ZONE 9TH MAIN RD, 2ND BLOCK, Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16181 WP No. 9004 of 2026 JAYANAGAR EAST, JAYANAGAR - BENGALURU - 560 011. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT BBMP AUTHORITIES, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND SUBORDINATES TO NOT PRECIPITATE, ISSUE FURTHER THREATS, OR TAKE ANY COERCIVE ACTION, INCLUDING EVICTION OR DEMOLITION AGAINST THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, inadvertently, all the necessary grounds had not been stated in the writ petition. It is further submitted that they intend to challenge the eviction order passed by the respondent - Greater Bengaluru Authority (for short, 'the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16181 WP No. 9004 of 2026 GBA'), which, due to inadvertence, has also not been challenged in the present writ petition. Hence, he has prayed that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action. 2. His submission is placed on record. 3. The Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the eviction order passed by the respondent- GBA against the petitioner in accordance with law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8