DR MAUSHUMI BAROOAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1689/2026 · 2026-06-09
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7765 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7765 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010140752021
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/1689/2026 DR MAUSHUMI BAROOAH W/O SHRI GEORGE CHACKO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO. 8 SATYA SHIV RAM BORA ROAD CHITRACHAL NABAGRAHAMANDIR AREA GUWAHATI - 781004. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM LAND REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI - 6.
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP M GUWAHATI - 781001.
3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE GUWAHATI - 781001.
4:MRS REENA GOSWAMI W/O LATE UGRA GOSWAMI R/O SATYA SHIV RAM BORA ROAD CHITRACHAL NEAR NABAGRAHA MANDIR
Page No.# 2/2 GUWAHATI - 781004.
5:THE CHAIRMAN ASSAM LAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE DISTRICT - KAMRUP M GUWAHATI - 781006. ------------ Advocate for : MR B D DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10.06.2026
Heard Mr. B.D. Das, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. H.R. Das, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department; Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel and Mr. G. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for the respondent No.4. This is an application praying for striking out the name of the respondent No.5 i.e., the Chairman, Assam Land Advisory Committee, District Kamrup(M) in the connected WP(C) 4456/2021. It is submitted by the learned senior counsel that the respondent No.5 is no longer exist and therefore, the respondent No.5 is not required to be made a party respondent in the connected writ petition. Having considered that the Office of the Chairman, Assam Land Advisory Committee, Kamrup appears to be not in existence and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to allow this application by striking out the name of the respondent No.5, i.e. The Chairman, Assam Land Advisory Committee, Kamrup from the array of party respondent No.5 in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, the name of the respondent No.5 stands struck off. I.A. stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant