DEBAJIT DAS v. KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUOS COUNCIL AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/422/2021 · 2026-06-09
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7764 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7764 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010012522021
2026:GAU-AS:8132
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/422/2021 DEBAJIT DAS S/O LATE TILAK CHANDRA DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PWD COLONY, KHERONI, PO AND PS KHERONI, DIST WEST KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, 782448 VERSUS KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUOS COUNCIL AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY PO DIPHU, DIST KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, 782460 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( R AND B) HILLS ASSAM KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU PO DIPHU DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 782460 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( R AND B) BAITHALANGSO DIVISION KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU PO DIPHU DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 782460 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Page No.# 2/3 KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU PO DIPHU DIST KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 782460 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SARMAH, MR. S UPADHAY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, K A A C,SC, PWD
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
ORDER Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the PWD (respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 5) and Ms. S. Kemprai, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the KAAC (respondent Nos. 1 and 3). The issue involved in the present writ petition pertains to the non-consideration of the petitioner’s claim for appointment on compassionate grounds following the demise of his father, who was serving as a Junior Engineer under the Executive Engineer, PWD (Roads), Baithalangso Division, Karbi Anglong, Assam. Mr. M. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has been appointed as a Dak Runner (Grade-IV) in the regular
Page No.# 3/3 establishment on compassionate grounds against a sanctioned vacant post by order dated 29.11.2021. A copy of the said order has been furnished before the Court, which is taken on record and marked as
“X”.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that although the principal grievance raised in the writ petition stands redressed by virtue of the aforesaid appointment, the petitioner, after joining service and receiving salary for an initial period of 6 (six) months, has not been paid any further salary till date. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon
consideration of the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the grievance forming the subject matter of the present writ petition has substantially been redressed. Consequently, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Before parting with the record, this Court deems it appropriate to observe that, in the event the petitioner’s grievance regarding non- release of salary still subsists, the competent authorities of the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC) shall examine the matter and take appropriate steps in accordance with law for redressal of the same at the earliest. JUDGE Comparing Assistant