[2026:RJ-JP:10276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2874/2026 Shambhunath S/o Kanwarnath, R/o Doi Ka Kheda, Police Station Fuliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, At Present Basdi Byepass, Dausa, Police Station Sadar, District Dausa. (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3191/2026 Ajay S/o Rameshnath, R/o Chhota Mahsara Police Line Jail Ke Pass Dausa Police Station Sadar District Dausa At Present Jhuggi Jhopdi 5 Batti Chauraha Rampura Railway Phagi Police Station Phagi District Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. DK Dixit, Adv. Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 10/03/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 2/2026 registered at Police Station Phagi, Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 331(4), 305(A)(D) BNS. [2026:RJ-JP:10276] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2874/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected. He further submits that petitioners Ajay and Shambhunath are behind the bars since 27.01.2026 and 28.01.2026 respectively; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and submits that there are criminal antecedents against both the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioners Ajay and Shambhunath are behind the bars since 27.01.2026 and 28.01.2026 respectively; alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail 5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Shambhunath S/o Kanwarnath and Ajay S/o Rameshnath are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:10276] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2874/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/87-88