Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7759 (BOM)

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THR LEGAL OFFICER NANDITHA PILLAI v. AUDREY DINIZ AND 2 ORS

MCA/412/2026 · 2026-09-11

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

32 MCA 412 2026 Sonam IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.412 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1518 OF 2026 (F) ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THR LEGAL OFFICER NANDITHA PILLAI ... APPLICANT Versus AUDREY DINIZ AND 2 ORS ... RESPONDENTS Mr. James Lopes, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. Godinho and Mr. K. Dessai, Advocates for Respondent No. 1. CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J. DATED :- 11th September, 2026 P.C.: 1. Though the application has been opposed by the Respondent No. 1, the delay of 53 days stands condoned for the following reasons: The Applicant has set out that after obtaining the certified copy of the impugned order and collecting the same on 08.01.2026, due to the resignation of the officer maintaining the Applicant’s office, there was a delay in the file being forwarded for legal approval. The Legal approval was obtained on 10.04.2026, after which the file had to be sent to the Regional Office at Hubli and 11th September, 2026 2026:BHC-GOA:1844 32 MCA 412 2026 then Head Office at Bangaluru, after which the sanction was obtained to file the Appeal. The application is supported by an Affidavit. Though the explanation given is bit sketchy for the block period for the time spent in moving the file, considering that the delay is a general explanation, I allow the application and the delay of 53 days stands condoned. 2. The application stands disposed of. VALMIKI MENEZES, J. 11th September, 2026