Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7759 (ALL)

SHIV KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/37498/2026 · 2026-09-17

Ajit Kumar, Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37498 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus to command the respondent concerned to de-freeze the account of the petitioner being No.- 20239675247 maintained with State Bank of India. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the account has been freezed primarily on a complaint received from the Investigating Agency for there being doubtful transactions in his account. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to apply before the concerned respondent for de- freezing of the account and if he does so, the concerned respondent shall decide the same within a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, in the light of the judgment of this Court in Ashish Rawat v. Union of India and 6 others, passed in Writ-C No. 1489 of 2026, decided on 08.04.2026. September 18, 2026 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savant Singh, Vinay Kumar Singh Singraur Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Ojha, Satish Chaturvedi (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Shiv Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad