Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7758 (UTT)

GEETIKA GURUNG v. VIJAY NATH SHUKLA

CLCON/147/2026 · 2026-07-07

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010052052026 2026:UHC:5498 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLCON/147/2026 Geetika Gurung --Petitioner Versus Vijay Nath Shukla --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned Counsel appears for respondent no.1. 3. Mr. Mohit Bhauryal, learned Counsel appears for respondent nos.2 and 3. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent no.1 has filed compliance affidavit along with Misc. Application (IA/2/2026). The application is allowed. Compliance affidavit is taken on record. 5. It has been stated in compliance affidavit that the Court’s order has been complied with and representation of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 14.05.2026 which is Annexure No.1 to the compliance affidavit. 6. In view of the averments made in the compliance affidavit, contempt petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 07.07.2026 R.Dang