RANDEEP SINGH ALIAS RAMANDEEP SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3359/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7756 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7756 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11985] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3359 of 2026
------ Randeep Singh @ Ramandeep Singh, aged about 22 years, Son of Surendra Singh, Resident of Village- Kuraiu Patraa, Post + P.S.- Lesliganj, District- Palamu, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Shankar Tiwary, Advocate.
: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate.
For the State
: Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2)/ 109(20/103(1), 352, 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the co-accused Roshan Prasad Gupta has dashed his car and committed murder of Ankit Kumar Singh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. The main allegation is against co- accused Roshan Prasad Gupta and there is no direct allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1929 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-23 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.01.2026 as mentioned in para-24 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Amar/