Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7756 (ALL)

CHINTU THARU v. PURVANCHAL VIDHUT VITRANA NIGAM LTD AND ANOTHER

WRIC/28800/2026 · 2026-09-16

Satya Veer Singh, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28800 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. R.K. Mishra, learned advocate holding the brief appears for respondents (the supply company). He submits, the compensation has been paid. Mr. Viresh Kumar Gupta, learned advocate appears for petitioner and submits, that is so. 2. Reproduced below is paragraph 1 from our order dated 3rd September, 2026. "1. Mr. V.K. Gupta, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, son of his client died by electrocution. Prayer is for payment of compensation. Mr. R.K. Mishra, learned advocate holding the brief appears for respondents (the electricity company). He hands up his instruction including enclosure of recommendation dated 21st July, 2026 to Director Finance for sanction and disbursement of compensation at Rs.5,00,000/-. On query Mr. Mishra seeks adjournment to report payment made in the meantime, upon complying with the formalities involved." We appreciate gesture of the electricity company. Petitioner has found his relief. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. September 17, 2026 Mohini Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tarun Kumar Sahu, Viresh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Narendra Kumar Tiwari (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Chintu Tharu .....Petitioner(s) Purvanchal Vidhut Vitrana Nigam Ltd And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad