Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7753 (CHH)

SANTOSH JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/816/2026 · 2026-04-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 816 of 2026 1 - Santosh Jaiswal S/o Late Ramashraya Jaiswal, Aged About 48 Years C/o Ramashraya Jaiswal, Ward No. 4, New Mines Vtc Bhatgaon (Np), P.O. Bhatgaon Colliery, Sub District Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary- Electronic And Information Technology Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (Chips), State Data Centre Bhawan, Civil Line Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - E- Governance And Information Technology Department (Degs) Surajpur, Collectorate Office Surajpur, District Surajpur C.G. 5 - E- District Manager, District Surajpur (C.G.), Collectorate Office Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - Jitendra Kumar S/o Prahlad Jaiswal, Aged About 40 Years Purana Miners, Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri AS Rajput, Advocate. For State/Res. : Shri Shreyansh Mehta, PL. For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/04/2026 1. The petitioner by way of this Writ Petition is challenging the list of in house model Aadhar Operator dated 27.06.2025 issued by Respondent No.3 by which, Respondent No.6 has been allotted/appointed as Aadhar Operator of e-house model at Nagar Panchayat Bhatgaon District Surajpur, C.G. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.04.27 18:13:47 +0530 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition as he is already pursing his matter by way of his application (Annexure P/1) before concerned Collector. However, he prays that the Collector concerned may be directed to consider the application of the petition and pass necessary order within a stipulated time frame. 3. Since the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition, It is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn and the Collector concerned is directed to consider and decide the application (Annexure P/1) of the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash