05.02.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 161. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 2243 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No. 209 of 2024 dated 29.04.2024 under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Habibul Sk. ……Petitioner. Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh Ms. Debolina Roy ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Kausik Kundu Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year and 7 months and there are hardly any evidence to implicate the petitioner in connection with the offence. Learned advocate for the State has relied upon the evidence of Ullad Dafadar. The case is circumstantial evidence but the connecting link happens to be this particular witness. Considering the case having been committed and have been placed before the transferee court, I direct the learned Trial Court to overcome the stage of consideration of charge and examine this witness as PW 1. 2 Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of this witness is over. Let the aforesaid process be completed within 3 months. At this stage, CRM (M) 2243 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)