Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7749 (ALL)

AKUP AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/38240/2026 · 2026-09-16

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38240 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of the charge- sheet dated 19.08.2011 as well as non-bailable warrant dated 29.01.2014 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Mathura in Case No.3284/IX/2016, arising out of NCR No.53 of 2011, under sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Govardhan, District- Mathura, including the entire proceedings of above-mentioned case. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, non-bailable warrant and the proceedings of said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Thereafter, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to non-bailable warrant dated 29.01.2014, to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicants are directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned non-bailable warrant dated 29.01.2014 within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shamshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akup And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) against the applicants. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have already been granted bail in this case and as such learned court concerned may not compel them to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. September 17, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 38240 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad