Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7744 (ORI)

BHIM CHARAN TUDU v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/11638/2026 · 2026-04-22

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11638 of 2026 Bhim Charan Tudu …. Petitioner Mr. M. Pati, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 22.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “The petitioner therefore prays that your lordships may graciously be pleased to direct the Opposite parties more particularly OP-1 for allotment of G.P.F. Account and governing their official status as a Pre-2005 appointee so as to draw the pensionary benefits under O.C.S. Pension Rule, 1992 and keeping in view the related Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and in accordance with the provisions of Rule 2 (r) and 10 of O.C.S. pension Rule, 1992., and thereby the application for consideration of past services as qualifying service for the purpose of pension and gratuity as per Annexure- 5, 6 & 7 within a stipulated time.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev