ABHAY KUMAR MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT
W.P.(Cr.)/266/2021 · 2026-04-23
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7744 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7744 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:11907
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 266 of 2021
Abhay Kumar Mishra, S/o Shri Surya Nath Mishra, R/o House. No. 14, Road No. 1, Birsa Nagar, Birsa Chowk, P.O.- Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Ranchi. Secretary-cum-Manager, Vivekanand Vidya Mandir, Sector-2, Dhurwa, P.O.- Sector-2, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Ranchi. --- --- Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary Home Department, Ranchi.
2. The Director General of Police, Ranchi.
3. Anti Corruption Bureau through its D.G., Ranchi.
4. D.I.G., Anti Corruption Bureau, Ranchi.
5. Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi.
6. S.P., Anti Corruption of Bureau, Ranchi.
7. Secretary, Lokayukt Office, Ranchi.
8. Sri Prabhash Kumar Barwar, Presently Posted as Dy. S.P., Sadar, Ranchi.
9. Sri Anup Kumar Karmakar, S/o Late Mantosh Karmakar, R/o Chitkohra Bazar, P.O. & P.S.- Anisabad, Patna, Bihar.
10. Sri Mahesh Tewari, R/o D43G, Sail City, P.O.- Pundag, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, Ranchi. --- --- Respondents
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Adv.
For the State : Mr. Shubham Gautam, AC to AAG-V
For the Resp. No. 7 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Resp. No. 9 : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, Adv.
For the Resp. No. 10: In-Person. --- 15/23.04.2026 Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 7, learned AC to AAG-V, Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey,
learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 9 and Mr. Mahesh Tewari, who has been arrayed as respondent no. 10 in this writ application.
The prayer which has been made in this writ
Neutral Citation 2026:JHHC:11907
application is for a direction upon the respondent no. 7 to transfer the file of Complaint Case (Lok Home) 03/20 to the Anti Corruption Bureau as at present, the Office of the Lokayukt is not functioning.
At the outset, it has been submitted by Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that Lokayukt has been appointed and is functioning, therefore, the prayer made in this writ application can be agitated before the Lokayukt.
In view of the fact that the prayer made in this writ application has become redundant on account of the appointment of Lokayukt, this writ application stands disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated- 23th April, 2026. Preet/- Uploaded on: 29 /04/2026.