MD ASLAM ALIAS MD. ASLAM MANSURI ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3352/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7741 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7741 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:12001] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3352 of 2026
------ Md. Aslam @ Md. Aslam Mansuri Ansari aged about 26 years son of Ismail Mansuri @ Md. Ismail Resident of Village- Naya Dhouda, P.O.- Giridih, P.S.- Giridih(M), District- Giridih.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.373 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109, 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, attempted to commit murder of Khurshid Ansari by firing upon him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the allegation of firing from the fire-arms is upon the co-accused Md. Jakir Ansari. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1406 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.12.2025 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.373 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Amar/