Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7740 (JHR)

ASGAR ALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1818/2026 · 2026-04-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11721 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1818 of 2026 ---- 1.Asgar Ali, aged about 52 years, son of late Fajuli Miya, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 2.Md. Tasalim, aged about 43 years, son of late Kolha Miyan, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 3.Fatama Khatoon aged about 54 years wife of Md. Mustak, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 4.Md. Azaz Hussain, aged about 48 years, son of Rahaman Miyan, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 5.Jakir Miyan, aged about 61 years, son of late Dulo Miyan, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 6.Mustak Miyan aged about 56 years son of late Ishak resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS Daru, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Shailesh Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Advocate ---- 2/21.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daru P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 74, 109(1), 324(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case 2026:JHHC:11721 2 due to previous enmity and 37 persons have been made accused and there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons of assault. He further submits that co- accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.1475 of 2026 and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of assault. 5. On perusal of the FIR it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against 37 persons of assault and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition and it has been pointed out that due to previous enmity the petitioners have been implicated in the case and co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.1475 of 2026, and in that view of the matter, the petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners, above named, on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 6. A.B.A. No.1818 of 2026 is disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 21.04.2026 SI/