Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:12028] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 2357 of 2026
Satish Prasad Verma, aged about 59 years S/o Late Bisheshwar Swarnkar, R/o Azad Nagar, P.O Bankmore and P.S. Bankmore (Bhuli O.P.), Distt. Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.. PP
02 / 22.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Saraidhela P. S. case no. 246 of 2025 instituted under Section 305(a) and Section 111(2) (b) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the goldsmith, was dishonestly receiving the stolen property, which was looted by the co- accused person from the house of the informant by committing lurking house trespass in the night. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.12.2025, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Dhanbad in connection with Saraidhela P. S. case no. 246 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 22.04.2026
Smita/-