[2026:RJ-JP:22064] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5298/2026 Manraj S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Revatpura, Police Station Chouth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 266/2025 registered at Police Station Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4) and 319(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the FIR it is alleged against the petitioner that in petitoner's mule account, 16 complaints were instituted on National Cyber Reporting Platform, alleging cyber fraud of around Rs.54,280,66/-. It is also contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner, however, in the charge-sheet, it is specifically mentioned that despite giving [2026:RJ-JP:22064] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5298/2026] notices to the complainants who lodged the complaint alleging cyber fraud, they did not turn up for giving their statements. It is also contended that prima facie offence under Section 318(4) of BNS is not made out against the petitioner as there is no one to state that the petitioner has fraudulently deceived the victims. The other witnesses who have been stated in the charge-sheet are only Police Officials. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Admittedly, in the charge-sheet, it is specifically mentioned that the persons who have lodged the complaint on cyber portal against the account maintained by the petitioner were given notices under Section 179 of BNSS, however, they denied to give their statement, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Manraj S/o Ramprasad, in connection with FIR No. 266/2025 registered at Police Station Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before [2026:RJ-JP:22064] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5298/2026] the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/36