HAIDAR MIYA ALIAS HAIDAR ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/723/2026 · 2026-06-09
Anjan Moni Kalita
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7736 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7736 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010058782026
2026:GAU-AS:8170
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/723/2026 HAIDAR MIYA ALIAS HAIDAR ALI SON OF LATE LAL MIYA RESIDENT OF VILL- RANGAPANI, P.S. AND DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, IMDADUL ISLAM,M RAHMAN,MR A BASUMATARY,MR. M M ZAMAN,MR N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 10.06.2026 Heard Mr. N. J. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the accused-applicant. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State respondent. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Barpeta P.S.
Page No.# 2/2 Case No. 18/2026, registered under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023. An FIR was lodged on 11.01.2026 by one Ohab Ali, alleging that the named accused in the FIR, i.e., Haidar Miya @ Haidar Ali, who is a broker in land sale and purchase, had been continuously pressurizing his father to sell a particular plot of land; that on 09.01.2026, at around 5:00 PM, the complainant’s father left home on a bicycle but he did not return home; that on 10.01.2026, at around 8:00 AM, the bicycle of the complainant’s father was found and upon further search, his father was found beside the river Chaulkhua, wherein his body was found lying dead with injury marks all over his face and forehead. Mr. Dutta, learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the victim person is an alcoholic and he is in the habit of consuming alcohol on daily basis and due to that the victim may have died. The Case Diary in the instant case has been produced and this Court has perused the same. After finding prima facie sufficient incriminating materials against the accused-applicant, this Court does not find any merit in the instant anticipatory bail application and accordingly, the same is dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant