C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 and O.A.No.972 of 2025 and A.Nos.5717 & 5768 of 2025 Ravi Mohan Studios Private Limited represented by its Managing Director Mr.Ravi Mohan Having office at 1B, Govindham Apartments, No.39, 2nd Line, Chamiers Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-600018 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Indo Bevs Private Limited Represented by its Authorized Signatory Having its registered office at B 230, C Block Road, Pocket A, Okhla Phase I, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi, Delhi 110 020. 2. M/s.Indospirit Beverages Private Limited Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Having its Registered Office at B-230, C Block Road, Pocket A, Okhla Phase -I, New Delhi-110020 (2nd defendant impleaded as per order dated 21.11.2025 in A.No.5719/2025) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 CPC, 1908 and Order IV Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956, Read With Sections 55, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 60, 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 and Section 7 of the Commercial Courts Act, Commercial Division, prays for the Judgment and Decree as follows:- (a) To declare that the Plaintiff’s use of the film title “BROCODE” for its cinematographic film does not infringe any trade mark rights of the Defendant. (b) Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendant, its men, agents, representatives and anyone claiming through it from issuing or making groundless threats of infringement, or otherwise interfering with the Plaintiff’s production, publicity, marketing, distribution, exhibition and release of the film titles “BROCODE”, including by addressing such threats to the Plaintiff’s distributors, exhibitors, OTT/TV partners, licensees or media platforms. (c) Cost of the suit to the Plaintiff. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Vignesh Venkatachalam Anu Ganesan, M.Rakshita For Respondent(s): M/s.Vadiraj Anirudh.S.G ********** JUDGMENT The plaintiff has filed memo dated 24.02.2026 stating that the plaintiff and the second defendant executed settlement agreement dated 16.02.2026, which https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 was recorded by the Delhi High Court in connected proceedings by order dated 17.02.2026. The plaintiff seeks to withdraw the suit in view of such settlement. 2. Accordingly, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.258 of 2025 is dismissed as settled out of Court without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected applications are closed. 25-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA C.S(COMM DIV) No. 258 of 2025 and O.A.No.972 of 2025 and A.Nos.5717 & 5768 of 2025 25-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis